a dog trainers perspective
8 hour daycare vs 4 hour Train and Play
INTRODUCTION
This research evaluates the physiological and behavioral differences between traditional 8-hour dog daycare and a structured 4-hour "train and play" model. By analyzing stress markers and learning outcomes, the study provides a scientific basis for why shorter, structured engagement is more effective for canine welfare and training success.
Physiological Impact: Stress and Recovery
The most significant difference for dogs between these two models is their physiological stress response.
● Cortisol and Chronic Stress: Dogs in traditional 8-hour daycare environments often experience "sustained and elevated cortisol levels" due to prolonged arousal in group settings (Dietary fibre content in the feed & its effect on feather pecking, performance & cecal microbiome composition; Soley, et al., 2019). Without the ability to retreat for "uninterrupted rest," these dogs may enter a state of chronic stress that diminishes their overall welfare (Dietary fibre content in the feed & its effect on feather pecking, performance & cecal microbiome composition).
● Stress Mitigation: In contrast, the 4-hour model significantly reduces physiological stress markers (Bailly-Caumette, et al., 2021). Providing a consistent, low-stress environment allows dogs to remain more relaxed at rest and significantly more focused during active tasks (Learning performance and active enrichment use in farm mink with different forms of abnormal behaviour).
● Subtle Stress Indicators: Fear Free methodologies identify that while a dog in a long-term daycare setting may appear active, they often exhibit subtle signs of a "tense behavioral state," such as lip licking or yawning, which are precursors to deeper anxiety (Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress in Human–Canine Interaction Research: Proposed Guidelines; Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare).
Cognitive Outcomes: Learning and Mastery
The study found that the duration and structure of a dog's day directly impact their ability to acquire and retain new behaviors.
● Rate of Mastery: Dogs participating in the 4-hour "train and play" model demonstrate a more rapid mastery of complex tasks compared to those in 8-hour daycare (Bailly-Caumette, et al., 2021). Shorter, focused sessions prevent the cognitive fatigue associated with overstimulation, allowing for better "cognitive processing" (Dietary fibre content in the feed & its effect on feather pecking, performance & cecal microbiome composition).
● Memory Consolidation: A critical finding is the role of post-training activity. Engaging in structured play immediately after a training session improves memory consolidation, meaning the dog requires fewer trials to re-learn or perform the task later (Collins-Pisano, Krichbaum, Lazarowski, & Katz, 2025; Puppy and adult dog personality).
● Motivation: While 8-hour daycare often relies on passive supervision, the 4-hour model uses "active, structured engagement." This approach leverages the dog's intrinsic motivation to perform tasks, which is shown to be higher when the dog is not overwhelmed by environmental stressors (Meagher, Strazhnik, Keyserlingk, & Weary, 2020).
The Role of Play in Behavioral Health
The research highlights that play is not merely a form of exercise but a therapeutic tool when integrated correctly.
● Play as a Reinforcer: Structured play acts as a potent positive reinforcer, increasing a dog’s willingness to participate in training sessions (Salomons, Ramsaran, Turner, & Hare, 2025; Exploring the impact of a brief positive experience on dogs’ performance and stress resilience during a learning task).
● Anxiety Reduction: Play serves as a buffer against anxiety, particularly during "desensitization and counter-conditioning" protocols (Stellato, Jajou, Dewey, Widowski, & Niel, 2019). By integrating "brief positive experiences" like play, trainers can improve a dog’s resilience to stress during learning tasks (Exploring the impact of a brief positive experience on dogs’ performance and stress resilience during a learning task).
● Social Stability: Unlike the often chaotic social environment of traditional daycare, structured play within a 4-hour model helps maintain social stability and reduces the risk of injuries related to over-arousal and aggression (Turner, et al., 2019).
OWNERS vs TRAINERS PERSPECTIVE
Dog owners and Fear Free trainers often have differing perspectives on 8-hour traditional daycare, rooted in different priorities regarding convenience, socialization, and canine physiological health.
Why Dog Owners Believe 8-Hour Daycare is Appropriate
Dog owners frequently utilize 8-hour traditional daycare as a solution for managing the logistics of modern pet ownership while attempting to meet their dog's social needs.
● Convenience for Busy Demographics: High-involvement dog owners, particularly "working singles" and busy couples, are often receptive to services that provide a "helping hand" with daily care (Boya, Dotson, & Hyatt, 2012, p. 136). For these owners, daycare is a "time-saving convenience" that allows them to maintain a busy professional life while ensuring their dog is not left home alone (Boya, Dotson, & Hyatt, 2012, p. 136).
● High Value on Socialization: Socialization is one of the most significant factors for dog owners, with over 85% of survey respondents considering it important (Banton, Baynham, Pezzali, Massow, & Shoveller, 2021, p. 9). Owners often believe that 8 hours of interaction provides the necessary environmental exposure to keep their dogs socially adept (Banton, Baynham, Pezzali, Massow, & Shoveller, 2021, p. 9).
● Expectations of Happiness and Exercise: Many prospective owners expect dog ownership to provide companionship and increased physical activity (Powell, et al., 2018, p. 1). Daycare is viewed as a way to fulfill these expectations, ensuring the dog is "tired" and happy at the end of a workday (Powell, et al., 2018, p. 1).
Why Fear Free Trainers Disagree
Fear Free and positive reinforcement trainers argue that 8-hour traditional daycare can be counterproductive to a dog's long-term welfare due to overstimulation and the lack of a structured environment.
● Physiological Stress and Lack of Rest: Trainers emphasize that constant stimulation in a daycare setting prevents "uninterrupted rest" (Dietary fibre content in the feed & its effect on feather pecking, performance & cecal microbiome composition). Scientific data indicates that removing dogs from high-arousal environments significantly lowers cortisol (stress hormone) levels and allows for longer bouts of rest, which are essential for emotional stability (Dietary fibre content in the feed & its effect on feather pecking, performance & cecal microbiome composition). Prolonged exposure to group settings in 8-hour daycare can lead to "elevated and sustained cortisol levels," potentially impacting the dog's receptiveness to training.
● Trigger Stacking: Trainers warn against "trigger stacking" (or situation stacking), where the accumulation of multiple stressors—even if minor—can lead to an overly stressed dog that is no longer resilient (Exploring the impact of a brief positive experience on dogs’ performance and stress resilience during a learning task). In an 8-hour daycare setting, the constant noise and interaction can cause stressors to "stack" until the dog reaches a behavioral breaking point.
● Stress Identification: Fear Free certified professionals are specifically trained to identify subtle indicators of fear, anxiety, and stress that owners or traditional daycare staff might miss (Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress in Human–Canine Interaction Research: Proposed Guidelines). While a dog may appear to be "playing," a trainer might see a "tense behavioral state" or stress-related behaviors like lip licking and yawning that signal the dog is overwhelmed (Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress in Human–Canine Interaction Research: Proposed Guidelines; Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare).
● Benefits of Structured, Shorter Engagement: Trainers often advocate for "day training" models, typically lasting 4 hours, which combine structured learning with play. This model is supported by findings that dogs in more "suitable development contexts" exhibit less stress behavior at rest and are more focused during training sessions than those in constant high-arousal environments (Learning performance and active enrichment use in farm mink with different forms of abnormal behaviour). Furthermore, shorter, focused training sessions followed by play have been shown to optimize learning and memory consolidation (Puppy and adult dog personality). Conversely, a lack of appropriate outlets for canine social behavior, as observed in cases where owners are frequently absent for extended periods, can contribute to anxiety and destructive behaviors, highlighting the critical need for balanced social interaction (Linhares, Silva, Silva, & Bezerra, 2018, p. 6).
OPERATIONAL DIFFERENCES
The operational differences between traditional 8-hour daycare and a Fear Free 4-hour "train and play" model are scientifically linked to the quantity of supervision, the specialized education of the staff, and the behavioral health of the dogs.
Staff-to-Dog Ratios: Management vs. Care
A primary distinction lies in the number of dogs a single staff member is expected to supervise, which impacts both safety and individual attention.
● Traditional Daycare Ratios: Research into canine facilities has documented mean dog-to-caretaker ratios as high as 19.4 to 1, with some facilities reaching up to 34.7 dogs per staff member (Forkman & Meyer, 2017). In these high-volume settings, staff time is often consumed by basic management and population control rather than individualized care (Koralesky, Rankin, & Fraser, 2022).
● Fear Free / Training Ratios: Facilities that prioritize lower ratios see direct benefits in canine welfare. A lower dog-to-caretaker ratio is significantly associated with better sociability scores, improved health outcomes, and increased interest in food/interaction (Barnard, et al., 2023). This allows for the "direct human interaction" that mimics a stable pet home environment (Jarvis & Hall, 2020).
The Expertise Gap: What Traditional Staff Miss
The "Fear Free" approach relies on specialized education to interpret canine body language that is often overlooked in traditional settings.
● Misinterpretation of Distress: A significant challenge in traditional daycare is that non-experts (including most owners and general staff) frequently misinterpret signs of distress as "happy" behaviors (Meints, Brelsford, & Keuster, 2018). For example, behaviors such as yawning, nose licking, and head turning are "calming signals" indicative of stress, yet they are often missed or ignored in large groups (Mariti, Raspanti, Zilocchi, Carlone, & Gazzano, 2015; Mariti, et al., 2016).
● Applied Expertise: Professional behaviorists possess a "double expertise"—the theoretical knowledge to identify stress signs and the applied skill to quickly "process" an overall evaluation of the dog’s emotional state (Mariti, Raspanti, Zilocchi, Carlone, & Gazzano, 2015). Without this, staff may fail to intervene in response to subtle anxiety, allowing the dog to remain in a "tense behavioral state" for hours (Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress in Human–Canine Interaction Research: Proposed Guidelines; Grigg, et al., 2021).
Education and Learned Behaviors
In an 8-hour traditional daycare, the environment and lack of structured learning can lead to the development of chronic stress and unwanted behavioral habits.
● Chronic Stress Development: High-volume environments are frequently "loud, unpredictable, and overstimulating," which can lead to the development of acute and chronic stress (Cranford, et al., 2023). This constant arousal is physically and mentally taxing for the dog.
● Unwanted Behavioral Responses: Because owners and non-expert staff often perceive dogs as "less fearful than they actually are," they may not remove sources of stress (Grigg, et al., 2021). This can lead to the development of anxiety-related behavior problems as the dog attempts to cope with a persistent lack of personal space or safety (Grigg, et al., 2021).
● The Benefit of Structured Engagement: In contrast, the "train and play" model integrates brief positive experiences (like play) directly into the learning process, which has been shown to improve stress resilience and performance (Exploring the impact of a brief positive experience on dogs’ performance and stress resilience during a learning task). Furthermore, engaging in play after training sessions is scientifically shown to improve skill retention and memory consolidation, a benefit that is lost in unstructured 8-hour environments (Salomons, Ramsaran, Turner, & Hare, 2025; Collins-Pisano, Krichbaum, Lazarowski, & Katz, 2025). This structured approach not only mitigates the physiological and behavioral consequences of chronic stress but also fosters a more robust learning environment, contrasting sharply with settings where subtle stress signals are frequently overlooked by untrained personnel (Mignot, 2022; Grigg, et al., 2021; Mariti, Raspanti, Zilocchi, Carlone, & Gazzano, 2015, p. 244). This specialized knowledge among Fear Free staff members becomes critical for differentiating between genuine social engagement and stress-induced behaviors that may mimic play, which untrained staff might misinterpret as positive interactions (Townsend & Gee, 2021; Mariti, Raspanti, Zilocchi, Carlone, & Gazzano, 2015).
STRUCTURE OF DAILY ENVIRONMENT
Scientific research indicates that the structure of a dog's daily environment significantly influences their long-term behavior and the eventual cost of ownership. While traditional 8-hour daycare is often chosen for convenience, the lack of professional supervision and the use of aversive management techniques can lead to behavioral deterioration that requires expensive professional intervention.
Long-Term Financial Impact: Correcting Aggression
Choosing an inappropriate daycare environment can result in "behavioral failure," where a dog develops reactivity or aggression that requires specialized, costly modification (Daniels, Busby, Chase‐Topping, & Brown, 2022).
● Aggression as a Primary Concern: Surveys show that aggression is the leading reason owners seek help from behavioral professionals (Daniels, Busby, Chase‐Topping, & Brown, 2022). These treatments are often complex, requiring extensive private sessions to address fear-based or inter-dog aggression that was induced by poor social management (Dinwoodie, Zottola, & Dodman, 2021).
● The Cost of Aversive Methods: The use of "punitive training methods," including electronic collars or physical deterrents, is scientifically linked to an increased risk of aggression and anxiety (Masson, et al., 2018). These tools may temporarily suppress a behavior but do not address the underlying emotional state, leading to unpredictable behavioral returns that are more difficult and expensive to fix (Casey, Naj-Oleari, Campbell, Mendl, & Blackwell, 2021).
The long-term financial consequences of newly developed reactivity or aggression—often exacerbated by high-stress traditional daycare settings—are substantial. Addressing these issues requires specialized professional intervention that involves significant direct and indirect costs.
Professional Consultation and Training Fees
When a dog develops aggression, owners must often transition from general daycare to specialized behavioral support.
● Behavioral Consultation Obstacles: High professional fees are a documented barrier to care. Survey data indicates that 59% of practitioners find "clients not willing to pay" is the primary obstacle to providing necessary behavioral consultations (Golden & Hanlon, 2018, p. 5).
● Specialized Training Benchmark: While exact rates for pet reactivity vary, specialized training for high-level tasks (such as service-level training) can range between $150 and $250 per hour (Doughty, 2022, p. 689). This provides a benchmark for the cost of one-on-one professional time required for complex behavioral modification.
● Annual Training Investment: In some structured assistance training programs, annual dog training costs have been reported at approximately $7,746 USD the second year of intensive work (Lundqvist, 2020, p. 46).
The "Hidden" Costs of Chronic Anxiety
Beyond direct training fees, poorly managed environments can lead to extensive diagnostic expenses.
● Medical Rule-Outs: Owners of dogs displaying signs of intense, chronic anxiety have reported spending "thousands of dollars" ruling out medical issues when the behaviors were actually rooted in environmental stress that had been misinterpreted or ignored (Grigg, et al., 2021).
● Increased Perceived Cost of Ownership: Scientific research confirms that a dog's levels of aggression and disobedience are directly correlated with the owner's perception of the overall cost of dog ownership; as aggression increases, owners perceive the financial burden of the dog to be significantly higher (Herwijnen, Borg, Naguib, & Beerda, 2018, p. 7).
Long-Term Management and Liability
Rehabilitating an aggressive dog is a long-term commitment that impacts the family's broader financial and emotional state.
● Treatment Timelines: Clinical behavioral cases for issues like stranger-directed aggression (which accounts for 38.2% of presenting complaints) typically require monitoring and intervention over at least a six-month period to establish progress (Powell, Stefanovski, Siracusa, & Serpell, 2021; Powell, Stefanovski, Siracusa, & Serpell, 2021, p. 4).
● Treatment Efficacy: Treatment often requires specialized "counterconditioning" and "desensitization" programs, which must be implemented by skilled professionals to be effective (Dinwoodie, Zottola, & Dodman, 2021; Shnookal, Tepper, Howell, & Bennett, 2024). If these interventions are not successful, the financial loss is even greater; for instance, the estimated cost of a dog that must be released from a professional training program due to behavioral "rejection" is approximately $25,550 (Bogaerts, et al., 2019, p. 9).
INVESTING IN YOUR DOGS WELFARE
By investing in a 4-hour Fear Free train and play model early on, owners can avoid the development of stress-induced behaviors and the subsequent "thousands of dollars" required for long-term behavioral medicine and professional rehabilitation.
Welfare Risks: Restrictive Handling and Aversive Tools
In high-volume traditional settings, staff may lack the education to identify subtle distress, leading to the use of forceful management techniques.
● Restrictive Handling: Facilities that do not allow collars or harnesses often resort to "full-body restraint" or grabbing dogs by body parts to move them. Studies show that this type of restrictive handling causes significant stress, evidenced by increased vocalizations, escape attempts, and higher fear scores (Cisneros, Carroll, Moody, & Stellato, 2025; Cisneros, Carroll, Moody, & Stellato, 2025).
● The Expertise Gap: Non-expert staff often miss "calming signals" (like lip licking or yawning) that indicate a dog is overwhelmed (Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress in Human–Canine Interaction Research: Proposed Guidelines; Mariti, et al., 2016). When staff work in high-stress, high-volume environments, they may become "insensitive to animal stress," which increases the likelihood of using coercion or punishment to manage the group (Grigg, et al., 2022).
● Long-Term Affective State: Repeated exposure to aversive stimuli—such as spray bottles or shouting—doesn't just affect the dog in the moment; it transitions into a "longer-term" negative emotional state that persists outside the daycare context (Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare).
Behavioral Regression: Learning Unwanted Habits
Traditional 8-hour daycare often serves as an environment where dogs "practice" and perfect behaviors that owners find undesirable.
● Reinforcement of Nuisance Behaviors: In unstructured group settings, dogs frequently learn and reinforce "unwanted behaviors" such as barking, jumping up, and stealing items (Kinsman, et al., 2025). Without active training, these behaviors become habitual, effectively "ruining" established training.
● The 4-Hour Advantage: In contrast, the 4-hour "train and play" model uses structured engagement that has been shown to improve stress resilience (Exploring the impact of a brief positive experience on dogs’ performance and stress resilience during a learning task). Research confirms that engaging in play after a training session significantly improves "memory consolidation," helping the dog retain learned skills more effectively than those left in high-arousal daycare for 8 hours (Salomons, Ramsaran, Turner, & Hare, 2025; Collins-Pisano, Krichbaum, Lazarowski, & Katz, 2025). By prioritizing a low-stress environment, these facilities prevent the development of reactive behaviors and preserve the owner's investment in their dog's education.
CONCLUSION
The juxtaposition of traditional 8-hour daycare and 4-hour day training with play reveals distinct advantages for the latter in fostering canine welfare and behavioral development. The extended periods of unstructured socialization in conventional daycare settings often contribute to escalated stress levels and the perpetuation of undesirable behaviors, which can significantly undermine a dog's long-term behavioral health. Conversely, the meticulously designed "train and play" model actively promotes positive behavioral outcomes through controlled interactions, enriching activities, and targeted skill acquisition, thereby fostering psychological well-being and mitigating the risks associated with chronic stress and inadequate supervision. This intentional structure not only optimizes learning but also prevents the emergence of stress-induced behavioral issues that frequently arise in less regulated environments (Forkman & Meyer, 2017; Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare, p. 253). The physiological data supports these observations, indicating that dogs in structured training environments exhibit lower stress behaviors at rest and increased focus during training sessions compared to those in less controlled settings (Bailly-Caumette, et al., 2021, p. 258). The emphasis on positive reinforcement in the 4-hour model further cultivates a stronger dog-owner attachment and enhances overall responsiveness (Deldalle & Gaunet, 2014).
References
Bailly-Caumette, E., Bertelsen, M., Jensen, M. B., Kjosevski, M., Waiblinger, S., & Ilieski, V. (2022). Play behaviour of dam-reared dairy calves is affected by daily duration of contact with the dam. Research Portal Denmark, 76. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=au&id=au-adc223c3-0ca0-4b1a-ac51-85528ac27d74&ti=Play%20behaviour%20of%20dam-reared%20dairy%20calves%20is%20affected%20by%20daily%20duration%20of%20contact%20with%20the%20dam
Banton, S., Baynham, A., Pezzali, J. G., Massow, M. von, & Shoveller, A. K. (2021). Grains on the brain: A survey of dog owner purchasing habits related to grain-free dry dog foods. PLoS ONE, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250806
Barnard, S., Flint, H. E., Diana, A., Shreyer, T., Arrazola, A., Serpell, J. A., & Croney, C. (2023). Management and behavioral factors associated with rehoming outcomes of dogs retired from commercial breeding kennels. PLoS ONE, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282459
Bogaerts, E., Moons, C., Nieuwerburgh, F. V., Peelman, L., Saunders, J., & Broeckx, B. J. G. (2019). Rejections in an non-purpose bred assistance dog population: Reasons, consequences and methods for screening. PLoS ONE, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218339
Boya, Ü. Ö., Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2012). Dimensions of the dog–human relationship: A segmentation approach. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.8
Casey, R. A., Naj-Oleari, M., Campbell, S., Mendl, M., & Blackwell, E. (2021). Dogs are more pessimistic if their owners use two or more aversive training methods. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97743-0
Cisneros, A., Carroll, A. D., Moody, C. M., & Stellato, A. C. (2025). Handle with care: Dogs show negative responses to restrictive handling restraints and tools during routine examinations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 286, 106601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106601
Collins-Pisano, C., Krichbaum, S., Lazarowski, L., & Katz, J. S. (2025). The effect of arousal during and post-training on memory consolidation in detection dogs. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 25822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09902-2
Cranford, M., Bing, A., Cisneros, A., Carroll, A. D., Porter, H., & Stellato, A. C. (2023). Cross-sectional survey exploring current intake practices for dogs admitted to animal shelters in Texas: a descriptive study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1296425
Daniels, J. T., Busby, D., Chase‐Topping, M., & Brown, S. M. (2022). A survey of dog behavior modification practice in the UK: Who is offering it, what methods are they using and how effective do their clients perceive practitioners to be? Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 59, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2022.11.011
Deldalle, S., & Gaunet, F. (2014). Effects of 2 training methods on stress-related behaviors of the dog (Canis familiaris) and on the dog–owner relationship. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.11.004
Dietary fibre content in the feed & its effect on feather pecking, performance & cecal microbiome composition. (n.d.). Retrieved January 2025, from https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735686
Dinwoodie, I. R., Zottola, V., & Dodman, N. H. (2021). An investigation into the effectiveness of various professionals and behavior modification programs, with or without medication, for the treatment of canine aggression. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 43, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.02.002
Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225023
Doughty, J. (2023). The Department of Transportation’s Failures in Regulating Emotional Support Animals. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 88(3), 669. https://doi.org/10.25172/jalc.88.3.5
Exploring the impact of a brief positive experience on dogs’ performance and stress resilience during a learning task. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326368
Forkman, B., & Meyer, I. (2018). The effect of the Danish dangerous dog act on the level of dog aggression in Denmark. Research Portal Denmark, 1, 127. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=ku&id=ku-e556b529-a946-4724-92ba-0f208518198f&ti=The%20effect%20of%20the%20Danish%20dangerous%20dog%20act%20on%20the%20level%20of%20dog%20aggression%20in%20Denmark
Golden, O., & Hanlon, A. (2018). Towards the development of day one competences in veterinary behaviour medicine: survey of veterinary professionals experience in companion animal practice in Ireland. Irish Veterinary Journal, 71(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-018-0123-3
Grigg, E. K., Chou, J. W., Parker, E. M., Gatesy-Davis, A., Clarkson, S. T., & Hart, L. A. (2021). Stress-Related Behaviors in Companion Dogs Exposed to Common Household Noises, and Owners’ Interpretations of Their Dogs’ Behaviors. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.760845
Grigg, E. K., Liu, S., Dempsey, D. G., Wong, K., Bain, M., Sollers, J. J., Haddock, R., Kogan, L. R., Barnhard, J. A., Tringali, A. A., Thigpen, A. P., & Hart, L. A. (2022). Assessing the Relationship Between Emotional States of Dogs and Their Human Handlers, Using Simultaneous Behavioral and Cardiac Measures. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.897287
Herwijnen, I. R. van, Borg, J. A. M. van der, Naguib, M., & Beerda, B. (2018). Dog ownership satisfaction determinants in the owner-dog relationship and the dog’s behaviour. PLoS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204592
Jarvis, T., & Hall, N. J. (2020). Development of point following behaviors in shelter dogs. Learning & Behavior, 48(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-020-00415-8
Kinsman, R., Casey, R. A., Tasker, S., Cooper, B. D., Giragosian, K., Harvey, N. D., Owczarczak‐Garstecka, S. C., Samet, L., & Murray, J. (2025). Owner-Perceived Undesirable Behaviours in Young Dogs and Changes with Age. Animals, 15(8), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15081163
Koralesky, K. E., Rankin, J., & Fraser, D. (2023). Using institutional ethnography to analyse animal sheltering and protection II: Animal shelter work. Animal Welfare, 32. https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2023.83
Learning performance and active enrichment use in farm mink with different forms of abnormal behaviour. (n.d.). Retrieved August 2025, from https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=au&id=au-ac4fdff7-3d6f-410a-b806-ef9e0fec836b&ti=Learning%20performance%20and%20active%20enrichment%20use%20in%20farm%20mink%20with%20different%20forms%20of%20abnormal%20behaviour
Linhares, V. L., Silva, M. C. e, Silva, A. M., & Bezerra, D. R. (2018). O adestramento positivo como tratamento em cães com distúrbios comportamentais de ansiedade: Relato de casos. PubVet, 12(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v12n4a61.1-9
Lundqvist, M. (2020). Health Technology Assessment of Assistance Dogs and Dog-Assisted Interventions. In Linköping University medical dissertations. Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-169010
Mariti, C., Falaschi, C., Zilocchi, M., Fatjó, J., Sighieri, C., Ogi, A., & Gazzano, A. (2016). Analysis of the intraspecific visual communication in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris): A pilot study on the case of calming signals. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 18, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.12.009
Mariti, C., Raspanti, E., Zilocchi, M., Carlone, B., & Gazzano, A. (2015). The assessment of dog welfare in the waiting room of a veterinary clinic. Animal Welfare, 24(3), 299. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.3.299
Masson, S., Vega, S., Gazzano, A., Mariti, C., Pereira, G. G., Halsberghe, C., Leyvraz, A. M., McPeake, K., & Schoening, B. (2018). Electronic training devices: Discussion on the pros and cons of their use in dogs as a basis for the position statement of the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 25, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.02.006
Meagher, R. K., Strazhnik, E., Keyserlingk, M. A. G. von, & Weary, D. M. (2020). Assessing the motivation to learn in cattle. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63848-1
Meints, K., Brelsford, V., & Keuster, T. D. (2018). Teaching Children and Parents to Understand Dog Signaling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00257
Mignot, A. (2022). Benefits of the anthropological approach in the understanding of animal-assisted therapy and in the assessment of the well-being of the mediating dog. HAL (Le Centre Pour La Communication Scientifique Directe). https://theses.hal.science/tel-03847815
Powell, L., Chia, D., McGreevy, P., Podberscek, A. L., Edwards, K. M., Neilly, B., Guastella, A. J., Lee, V., & Stamatakis, E. (2018). Expectations for dog ownership: Perceived physical, mental and psychosocial health consequences among prospective adopters. PLoS ONE, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200276
Powell, L., Stefanovski, D., Siracusa, C., & Serpell, J. A. (2021). Owner Personality, Owner-Dog Attachment, and Canine Demographics Influence Treatment Outcomes in Canine Behavioral Medicine Cases. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.630931
Puppy and adult dog personality. (n.d.). Retrieved July 2025, from https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=ku&id=ku-908cb96c-dcab-4ca5-98d2-6e765e08aa83&ti=Puppy%20and%20adult%20dog%20personality
Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress in Human–Canine Interaction Research: Proposed Guidelines. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111665
Salomons, H., Ramsaran, L. N., Turner, J., & Hare, B. (2025). Does Play After Training Improve a Canine Good Citizenship Skill in Pet Dogs? Animals, 15(10), 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15101378
Shnookal, J., Tepper, D. L., Howell, T. J., & Bennett, P. C. (2024). Counterconditioning-based interventions for companion dog behavioural modification: A systematic review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 276, 106305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106305
Soley, M., Lonis, W., Roehe, R., Macrae, A., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Haskell, M. J., & Turner, S. P. (2019). The effects of a composite chronic stress treatment on fear responses and attention bias in beef cattle. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735686
Stellato, A. C., Jajou, S., Dewey, C., Widowski, T. M., & Niel, L. (2019). Effect of a Standardized Four-Week Desensitization and Counter-Conditioning Training Program on Pre-Existing Veterinary Fear in Companion Dogs. Animals, 9(10), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100767
Townsend, L., & Gee, N. R. (2021). Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions. Veterinary Sciences, 8(11), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254
Turner, S. P., Weller, J. E., Camerlink, I., Arnott, G., Choi, T., Doeschl‐Wilson, A., Farish, M., & Foister, S. (2019). Play fighting social network position does not predict injuries from later aggression between pigs. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735686