why am i screaming?
DIDN’T YOU HEAR ME WHISPER?
How dogs escalate their communication with humans, is often described using a concept called "Shepherd's ladder of distress signals" or the "Canine Ladder of Aggression." This model illustrates a progression of signals a dog might use when feeling uncomfortable, stressed, or threatened (Meints et al., 2018; Oxley et al., 2024).
Here's a breakdown of how dogs typically escalate their communication:
1. Whispering: Subtle Conflict-Defusing Signals
These are often the earliest and most subtle signs a dog gives to communicate discomfort or to try and de-escalate a situation. If these signals are recognized and respected, further escalation can often be avoided (Meints et al., 2018).
Lip Licks/Nose Licks: Quick licks of the lips or nose (Meints et al., 2018; Walsh et al., 2024).
Turn Aways: Turning their head or entire body away from the perceived threat (Oxley et al., 2024; Walsh et al., 2024).
Whale Eye: Showing the whites of their eyes (Grigg et al., 2022).
Yawning: Often a sign of stress when not related to tiredness (Oxley et al., 2024; Walsh et al., 2024).
Freezing: Becoming still or rigid (Walsh et al., 2024).
Paw Raise: Lifting a paw (Oxley et al., 2024).
Backing Away: Attempting to increase distance from what is making them uncomfortable (Oxley et al., 2024).
Tail Tucked: Tucking their tail under their body (Meints et al., 2018).
2. Speaking: Conflict Escalation Signals
If the subtle "whispers" are ignored, a dog may feel the need to communicate more clearly and intensely. These signals indicate increased discomfort or a more direct warning (Meints et al., 2018; Swanepoel, 2022).
Staring: Directly gazing at the source of their discomfort (Meints et al., 2018).
Growling: A vocalization signaling displeasure or a warning (Meints et al., 2018; Reisner, 2003).
Lip Curls / Baring Teeth: Displaying teeth, often accompanied by a stiff posture, to indicate a direct threat (Oxley et al., 2024; Swanepoel, 2022).
Crouching: A lowered body posture, sometimes indicating fear or defensive aggression (Oxley et al., 2024).
Raising Hackles: Piloerection (hair standing on end) on the shoulders and neck to appear larger and more intimidating (Swanepoel, 2022).
3. Screaming: Overt Aggressive Acts
When earlier signals have been overlooked or the dog feels trapped and its attempts to avoid confrontation have failed, it may resort to more overt aggressive behaviors (Meints et al., 2018).
Air Snapping: Snapping their jaws in the air without making contact (Owczarczak‐Garstecka et al., 2018; Oxley et al., 2024).
Nipping: Making light contact with their teeth, often as a warning without full bite pressure (Borg et al., 2015).
Full Contact Biting: Biting with sufficient pressure to cause harm (Borg et al., 2015; Meints et al., 2018; Oxley et al., 2024).
It's crucial to remember that this "ladder" isn't always linear, and dogs may not go through every step in order (Meints et al., 2018). Factors like past experiences, physical health, and the specific context can influence how a dog communicates (Meints et al., 2018). Recognizing these signs is vital for preventing bites and fostering a better understanding between humans and dogs (Owczarczak‐Garstecka et al., 2018). Many "attacks without warning" actually occur because earlier, more subtle signals were missed or misinterpreted (Swanepoel, 2022).
WARNING SIGN SUPPRESSION
Understanding why we shouldn't punish a dog for displaying warning signals like growling, lip curling, or baring teeth is crucial for both canine well-being and human safety.
These behaviors are vital forms of communication, serving as clear warnings that a dog is feeling uncomfortable, threatened, or stressed. They are part of the "speaking" stage on the canine ladder of aggression, indicating that the dog is attempting to avoid direct confrontation (Meints et al., 2018; Swanepoel, 2022).
· Suppresses Warning Signs, Increases Bite Risk: Punishing a growl, lip curl, or baring of teeth can effectively teach a dog to suppress these warning signals (Masson et al., 2018). If a dog learns that vocalizing its discomfort leads to punishment, it may skip these warnings in the future and escalate directly to a bite without any overt signal, making attacks appear "unprovoked" and increasing the risk of injury (Masson et al., 2018; Swanepoel, 2022). Growling is a valuable, easy-to-recognize warning signal that should never be punished (Arhant et al., 2017).
· Breaks Down Communication: These signals are the dog's way of telling us, "I'm uncomfortable; please stop." If we punish these attempts at communication, we are essentially telling the dog that its feelings are not valid and that it shouldn't express them. This can lead to a breakdown in trust and understanding between the dog and its human (Swanepoel, 2022).
· Doesn't Address the Root Cause: Punishment focuses on suppressing a symptom (the warning signal) rather than addressing the underlying reason for the dog's discomfort or fear. It doesn't teach the dog what to do instead, nor does it resolve the situation that caused the dog to feel threatened in the first place (Casey et al., 2021).
· Increases Stress and Potential for Aggression: Aversive methods, including punishment, can create confusion and frustration in dogs. Some research suggests a correlation between the use of aversive training methods and an increased incidence of aggressive behaviors (Casey et al., 2021). Punishment can also lead to aggressive responses, potentially directed at the person applying the punishment or others nearby (Guilherme-Fernandes et al., 2017).
In essence, these warning signals are a dog's way of saying, "I'm about to bite if you don't stop, but I'd rather not." By respecting and understanding these signals, we can identify and remove the source of the dog's stress, prevent bites, and foster a healthier, more trusting relationship.
PROACTIVE TRAINING INSTEAD OF REACTIVE TRAINING
Proactive training, focusing on early signs of discomfort, is far more effective and humane than reacting once a dog has begun to escalate its communication. It's about recognizing the "whispers" before they turn into "shouts" or "screams" (Meints et al., 2018).
1. Understanding and Addressing Early Signals
Proactive training hinges on recognizing a dog's subtle signs of discomfort, such as lip licking, yawning, whale eye, or turning away (Meints et al., 2018). Intervening at this "whispering" stage can prevent the situation from escalating.
2. Positive Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement training involves rewarding desired behaviors, making the dog more likely to repeat them (Hiby et al., 2004). This approach is highly effective in treating behavioral anxiety disorders and fosters a healthier human-animal relationship (Linhares et al., 2018). For example, a dog uncomfortable with strangers can be rewarded for calm behavior at a safe distance, gradually reducing the distance as comfort increases (Linhares et al., 2018). Research indicates that positive reinforcement leads to better outcomes, while aversive training methods can increase fear and behavioral problems (Rooney et al., 2016; Ziv, 2017).
3. Desensitization and Counter-conditioning
These are foundational techniques in proactive behavior modification (Nakonechny et al., 2025).
Desensitization |: This technique reduces a dog's sensitivity to a stimulus that previously caused stress, anxiety, or fear (Hargrave, 2015). It involves gradually exposing the dog to the trigger at a low intensity that does not elicit a fear response (Bain, 2020; Rooney et al., 2016). The intensity is slowly increased only when the dog remains calm, ensuring the animal does not show fear (Feuerbacher & Muir, 2020; Speer et al., 2018).
Counter-conditioning |: This method aims to change a dog's emotional response to a stimulus from negative to positive (Keller & Dunsmoor, 2019; Poggiagliolmi, 2018). It involves pairing the previously aversive stimulus with something positive and highly rewarding, such as treats or praise, to create a new, positive association (Speer et al., 2018). This technique essentially replaces an undesirable behavior with a desirable and pleasant one (Linhares et al., 2018).
Both desensitization and counter-conditioning are effective for reducing fear and anxiety, including those related to veterinary visits and interactions with new people (Collins et al., 2022; Nakonechny et al., 2025).
4. Environmental Management
Proactive training also involves adapting the dog's environment to minimize exposure to triggers and reduce anxiety (Rooney et al., 2016). This can include strategies like providing a safe haven, such as a comfortable, covered dog crate, to give the dog a sense of security and reduce the intensity of fear-eliciting stimuli (Riemer, 2023). Environmental enrichment, such as mental and physical stimulation, also helps balance a dog's emotional system, improve learning, problem-solving skills, and minimize stress (Linhares et al., 2018).
By implementing these proactive training strategies, we can foster a dog's well-being, strengthen the human-animal bond, and significantly reduce the likelihood of aggressive displays (Linhares et al., 2018). It ensures that we are responsive to a dog's initial attempts at communication, preventing escalation and promoting a safer, more harmonious relationship.
References
Arhant, C., Beetz, A., & Troxler, J. (2017). Caregiver Reports of Interactions between Children up to 6 Years and Their Family Dog—Implications for Dog Bite Prevention. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00130
Bain, M. (2020). Surgical and Behavioral Relationships With Welfare [Review of Surgical and Behavioral Relationships With Welfare]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. Frontiers Media.
Borg, J. A. M. van der, Schilder, M. B. H., Vinke, C. M., & Vries, H. de. (2015). Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures. PLoS ONE, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978
Casey, R. A., Naj-Oleari, M., Campbell, S., Mendl, M., & Blackwell, E. (2021). Dogs are more pessimistic if their owners use two or more aversive training methods. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97743-0
Collins, K., Miller, K. A., Zverina, L., Patterson-Kane, E., Cussen, V. A., & Reid, P. (2022). Behavioral rehabilitation of extremely fearful dogs: Report on the efficacy of a treatment protocol. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 254, 105689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105689
Feuerbacher, E. N., & Muir, K. (2020). Using Owner Return as a Reinforcer to Operantly Treat Separation-Related Problem Behavior in Dogs. Animals, 10(7), 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071110
Grigg, E. K., Liu, S., Dempsey, D. G., Wong, K., Bain, M., Sollers, J. J., Haddock, R., Kogan, L. R., Barnhard, J. A., Tringali, A. A., Thigpen, A. P., & Hart, L. A. (2022). Assessing the Relationship Between Emotional States of Dogs and Their Human Handlers, Using Simultaneous Behavioral and Cardiac Measures. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.897287
Guilherme-Fernandes, J., Olsson, I. A. S., & Castro, A. C. V. de. (2017). Do aversive-based training methods actually compromise dog welfare?: A literature review [Review of Do aversive-based training methods actually compromise dog welfare?: A literature review]. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 196, 1. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.07.001
Hargrave, C. (2015). Desensitisation and counterconditioning — not a task for the enthusiastic amateur! The Veterinary Nurse, 6(7), 402. https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2015.6.7.402
Hiby, E., Rooney, N. J., & Bradshaw, J. (2004). Dog training methods: their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare. Animal Welfare, 13(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600026683
Keller, N. E., & Dunsmoor, J. E. (2019). The effects of aversive-to-appetitive counterconditioning on implicit and explicit fear memory. Learning & Memory, 27(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.050740.119
Linhares, V. L., Silva, M. C. e, Silva, A. M., & Bezerra, D. R. (2018). O adestramento positivo como tratamento em cães com distúrbios comportamentais de ansiedade: Relato de casos. PubVet, 12(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v12n4a61.1-9
Masson, S., Vega, S., Gazzano, A., Mariti, C., Pereira, G. G., Halsberghe, C., Leyvraz, A. M., McPeake, K., & Schoening, B. (2018). Electronic training devices: Discussion on the pros and cons of their use in dogs as a basis for the position statement of the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Ethology. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 25, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.02.006
Meints, K., Brelsford, V., & Keuster, T. D. (2018). Teaching Children and Parents to Understand Dog Signaling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00257
Nakonechny, L., Cisneros, A., Moody, C. M., & Stellato, A. C. (2025). Handling techniques and risk factors reported by veterinary professionals during dog examinations: a cross-sectional survey across Canada and the United States. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1634970
Owczarczak‐Garstecka, S. C., Watkins, F., Christley, R., & Westgarth, C. (2018). Online videos indicate human and dog behaviour preceding dog bites and the context in which bites occur. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25671-7
Oxley, J. A., Meyer, G., Butcher, M., Bellantuono, G., Levers, A., & Westgarth, C. (2024). Veterinary students’ proximity to and interpretation of a simulated “aggressive” dog before and after training. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53551-w
Poggiagliolmi, S. (2018). Desensitization and Counterconditioning [Review of Desensitization and Counterconditioning]. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, 48(3), 433. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2017.12.009
Reisner, I. R. (2003). Differential diagnosis and management of human-directed aggression in dogs [Review of Differential diagnosis and management of human-directed aggression in dogs]. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, 33(2), 303. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-5616(02)00132-8
Riemer, S. (2023). Therapy and Prevention of Noise Fears in Dogs—A Review of the Current Evidence for Practitioners [Review of Therapy and Prevention of Noise Fears in Dogs—A Review of the Current Evidence for Practitioners]. Animals, 13(23), 3664. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233664
Rooney, N. J., Clark, C. C., & Casey, R. A. (2016). Minimizing fear and anxiety in working dogs: A review [Review of Minimizing fear and anxiety in working dogs: A review]. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 16, 53. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.11.001
Speer, B. L., Hennigh, M., Muntz, B., & Zeeland, Y. R. A. van. (2018). Low-Stress Medication Techniques in Birds and Small Mammals [Review of Low-Stress Medication Techniques in Birds and Small Mammals]. Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal Practice, 21(2), 261. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2018.01.016
Swanepoel, N. (2022). INSIGHTS INTO CANINE COMMUNICATION AND INTERSPECIFIC MISINTERPRETATIONS. Communicare Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 15(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.36615/jcsa.v15i2.1910
Walsh, E., Meers, L., Samuels, W. E., Boonen, D., Claus, A., Duarte-Gan, C., Stevens, V., Contalbrigo, L., & Normando, S. (2024). Human-dog communication: How body language and non-verbal cues are key to clarity in dog directed play, petting and hugging behaviour by humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 272, 106206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106206
Ziv, G. (2017). The effects of using aversive training methods in dogs—A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 19, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.02.004